Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom Lens Sample Photos and Specifications

photo sharing and upload

picture albums

photo forums

search pictures

popular photos

photography help

login

All Cameras >> Nikon >> Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom

Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom SLR Lens Sample Photos

g4/87/331787/3/64884439.cY8PyRwb.jpg

Marketed: 09-Aug-2006

Lens: 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6

Random Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom Samples from 33372 available Photos more

Comments

Guest		18-Mar-2009 07:45
My favorite zoom, some pictures from Venice carnival: http://www.pbase.com/tominho/venice_carnival_2009

Guest		26-Oct-2008 00:23
Great zoom lens. VR works great, it's very responsive on my D300 (great combo) and plenty sharp enough. Here are a few galleries with plenty of 70-300 samples as well as some 17-55 f/2.8: http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/summertime http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/my_first_outing_with_the_d300 http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/nz

Guest		26-Oct-2008 00:20
Great zoom lens. VR works great, it's very responsive on my D300 (great combo) and plenty sharp enough. Here are a few galleries with plenty of 70-300 samples as well as some 17-55 f/2.8: http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/summertime http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/my_first_outing_with_the_d300 http://www.pbase.com/thrumyeyes/nz

rollosphotos		21-Aug-2008 18:40
This is a great lens! It has performed wonderfully for me with my Nikon D-80. It brought me closer to my subjects than I’ve ever been before. I had no problem using it on auto setting or manual. Image quality has been fantastic. The only drawback was that I could not photograph in low-light situations without using a flash. I sold this lens and bought the Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM to correct that problem. One of my favorite photos taken using the Nikkor 70-300mm lens http://www.pbase.com/rollosphotos/image/98442686

Guest		27-Jun-2008 05:15
For the money, I think there's no lens more versatile than the 70-300mm VR if you're shooting photos at car race tracks. And the quality ain't too shabby either :>http://nikon70300.dpnotes.com/nikon-70-300mm-samples-from-the-super-gt-race/

Piotrek		23-May-2008 13:06
I've got this lense from about 3 months with D80 camera. I would say it's a bit heavy (700 grams with camera it's 1,5 kg) and dark in general outlook of the photographs. Very good Vibration Reduction however below 2s of the exposure time (over 2s and motion will be blurred). Very good lense for half-amateurs who are looking in a bit artistic photographs.

Piotrek		23-May-2008 11:21
I've got this lense from about 3 months with D80 camera. I would say it's a bit heavy (700 grams with camera it's 1,5 kg) and dark in general outlook of the photographs. Very good Vibration Reduction however below 2s of the exposure time (over 2s and motion will be blurred). Very good lense for half-amateurs who are looking in a bit artistic photographs.

Guest		10-Apr-2008 04:32
This lens is miracle and can be compared with 80-400 VR in terms of picture quality however, it's got faster focus and 3 times lower price. If you don't desperately need to go 100mm farther. Here're a lot of 300mm shots from Central Park with this lens:http://www.pbase.com/msimic/cpark

Guest		24-Jan-2008 15:31
how is this lens? is it very nice o no? I would buy it soon.

Darbowski		22-Dec-2007 00:23
Très bon objectif, belle qualité d'image, bonne stabilisation

Marc Fish		11-Sep-2007 02:11
Just recieved mine 2 weeks ago. I am very pleased with the lens so far. I am looking forward to some great captures.

foto61.net		04-Sep-2007 11:57
Today I had the possibility to try a brandnew 70-300VR2. Straight out of the box it performed very well. The VR2 is just brilliant. Maybe I do shake with the ideal frequency of 10Hz :-) However, the VR2 completely eliminates camera shakes which results in sharper images. On the long end (300mm) with full open aperture (5,6) images are visibly softer but still okay. This can be eliminated by closing the aperture one step or two and reducing to around 280 or 250 mm. In some tests it was complained about yellow/blue CA's but the lens I could test did not produce CA's. At least not at 300/5,6 and the actual conditions. It seems that the lens works very good at 200mm and even better at the lower end (150/100/70mm). So what do I choose now? The 70-200/2,8VR for € 2000.- or the 70-300/VR2 for around € 520.-??? I am not sure that the 70-200 is 1500 euros better... what do you think? Regards Stefan

Guest		29-Jul-2007 00:42
Nice general purpose tele-zoom. VR is good. Seems a bit soft at 300mm, but a solid zoom. Has manual auto/manual focus as well as pure manual. Two VR modes, one for hand held, and a second active setting for shooting from a moving platform such as a car. Balances well on my d200.http://www.pbase.com/prinothcat/hummers was shot entirely hand held with this lens.

Guest		24-Jun-2007 10:31
very nice lens, I`m happy with it:-)Recommended

Guest		03-Feb-2007 11:34
For full size samples; http://www.pbase.com/cuneytselcuk/nikkor_70300_vr

iamd2		26-Dec-2006 20:04
Sharper than my nikon 18-200 vr

t. waseem		17-Dec-2006 00:07
Light compact sharp lense with IQ rivaling nikkor 80-400 vr at comparable focal length. Second-gen VR and AFS. A few Samples here. http://www.pbase.com/tjny/nikkor_70_300_ed_vr

All photos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission from the photographer.
These photos are are a guide to what these cameras are capable of, but may not fully represent the camera due to post-processing, scanning, or photographic technique.
All brands are trademarked by their owners.
These pages are not sponsored or approved by the manufacturers.
Other content Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006, pbase.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Contact cameras@pbase.com to contribute data or photos of cameras.